The Merger of
American Airlines and US Airways
Ever since the Deregulation Act was
passed in 1978 airlines have been merging with one another to reduce costs,
avoid bankruptcy, increase revenues, and remove redundant and competitive
flight schedules. The benefits from a
merger is intended to outweigh the consequential aspects such as combining
aircraft types and labor forces, and differences in technologies onboard each
company’s aircraft. Consideration must
also be made in regards to the consumer, and how a merger will change his or
her air travel experience and ticket price.
Once American Airlines and US Airways are combined, there will be
substantially less competition, and may cause ticket prices and baggage fees to
increase. Consolidation of the two
airlines could cause airport hubs in relatively smaller cities to close as
flights are cut, costing jobs and downsizing suburban airports. Opponents
of the merger are chiefly concerned with the potential
raise in airfare and the reduction of in-flight services; all costing the
consumer more money for less service. In
contrast, the Government
Account Office determined there are only twelve routes that overlap between
the two companies, making the two airlines complimentary to one another. Additionally, once the merge is concluded the
airline network created will offer more choices to customers for both domestic
and international connections. As the
airlines combine their respective connections they will be able to offer more
efficient routing options, providing a better service to customers.
A significant task when merging two
airlines is integrating the seniority lists of both company’s pilots. A commercial pilots’ place on the seniority
list determines what schedules and routes are available to them, income levels,
types of aircraft flown, and upgrades to captain. It is clear why pilots of merging airlines do
not take this issue lightly. There are four
essential goals when merging the seniority list of two companies. The first is to preserve jobs and avoid any
and all layoffs or furloughs. Second, do
not favor the seniority of one company’s pilots over the other, it creates a
hostile environment. The third goal for
pilots merging is maintain their status at the very least, if not improve
it. Finally, do not hinder a pilot’s
career expectations once the companies are successfully combined. It is painfully obvious not all of these
goals will be achieved in the process of merging two airlines, as was the case
with US
Airways and American West airlines. The
merging of these two companies took place in 2005 and is yet to compile a pilot
seniority list that fairly represents pilots from both airlines. Proposed agreements have strongly favored
those of American West airlines, causing US Airways pilots to create their own
union in opposition. Integrating
seniority lists cannot be given the same approach to each merger and with the
four goals above in mind a dynamic solution can be reached. Some aspects to consider when making a
seniority list as fair as possible include pilot status and category before the
merger, and avoid placing them lower in order if possible. A pilot’s longevity with the company is also
important to note, and includes time in service, date of hire, and furlough
time (if any). If any substantial safety
record exists on a pilot’s record, this too may be a factor affecting their
seniority.
As the American Airlines and US Airways
merger continues toward completion, the next process will be gaining approval
from the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division. This
is an essential step in determining economical outcomes from the merger include
public interest. Specifically, the
Antitrust Division will decide if the combining of these two businesses will
lessen competition to the extent the mergers are in a position to create a
business monopoly. It is likely the
merger will happen and although the competition will be considerably less, it
will also potentially benefit the consumer sufficiently to consider it a sound
economical action.
For anyone aspiring to a career in the
airline industry, this merger is welcome news.
US Airway’s profits will very likely increase with the absorption of
their chief competition. The outcome
will be an increase in routes, passengers, and aircraft, all of which demands
more jobs to support this flying. New
pilots will be needed to fly an expanding fleet, which is complimentary to the
looming pilot shortage we will possibly experience concurrent to the merged
airlines acquisition of new aircraft and routes. This means more baggage handlers, flight
attendants, Boeing mechanics, and many more qualified personnel will be in
demand throughout the next decade.
References
Perez,
E. (2013, August 13). US government seeks to block American-US Airways merger. Cable News Network. Retrieved from
http://www.cnn.com/
Reed,
T. (2013, August 9). US Airways pilots look to endgame in seniority dispute. The Street. Retrieved from http://www.thestreet.com/
Steenblik,
J. (2006, May). Managing the inevitable: What every pilot needs to know about
mergers. Air Line Pilot, 14-17.
U.S.
Government Accountability Office. (2013). Issues
raised by the merger of American airlines and US airways (NIH Publication
No. GAO 13-403T) Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/655314.pdf
Good post Joe, you answered all the required questions for this blog. I especially liked how mentioned the issues with merging airlines. The problems being, “combining aircraft types and labor forces, and differences in technologies onboard each company’s aircraft.” Many of the posts, including mine, focused on the issues of seniority lists, overlapping routes, and possible fare increases. But I completely forgot about the problems of integrating pilots into a completely new checklist procedures, and perhaps a whole new aircraft.
ReplyDeleteMerging can be a very difficult and very challenging for companies to complete. There is a lot to consider not only from a operational standpoint but a customer standpoint. While from a business standpoint it can be a great opportunity to upgrade and make the necessary changes to help their company further succeed, on the other hand, the company size could lead to controlling certain routes and demanding a higher than necessary price for their services. Hopefully the integration of the two companies can be as seem-less as possible to help to limit the difficulties of merging.
ReplyDeleteI like the point you made about the rise in airfare that is imminent once the merger is complete. As less and less airlines are in business, this reduces competition and allows the remaining large airlines to charge whatever price they want knowing that they have no other place to go. It is simple supply and demand, less airlines means less supply, in turn, they can jack up the prices.
ReplyDelete